This is for the few people that have actually followed my point:

Ad Absurdum as well as some Filosofers, and other random supporters of
idealistically chaotic bull**** wrote chancie-like stuff like:

I think this anthropic principle is
more of a vague 'final cause' thing to suppose that because we exist,
there must be some special place for us in the heart of the universe,
it must have planned to 'have' us all along. Just so happens I agree
with that........ doesn't mean, however, that part of our 'special
place' isn't to be wiped out suddenly with no chance to compose our
swan song and beam it into space to be inevitably received by some
intelligence who can appreciate it.



No, that's false, assuming that the universe evolves in the manner in
which I described, which, MY PHYSICS, BEING CORRECT, makes it the most
likely scenario. There is plenty of evidence to strongly support the
weak anthropic argument as a very special/fine connection to humans
alright, as long as you don't leap outside the most fundamental entropic
nature of nature in a big bang induced expanding universe.

The weak argument in an entropic light goes as follows:

1) How many systems do you know of that can produce anti-particles?...
puts us right up there with black holes and Super-Novae in terms of high
energy physics.

2) Beyond that, how many systems do you know of that "attempt" to mix
ALL levels of energy in nature?... puts us above those mentioned systems
in terms of entropic preference, so WE are nature's best hope and
preferred method for achieving mass equilibrium on a universal scale.

We are preferred by nature, baby, so you'd better crank up the
accelerators, the Port-o-Potties, and them BigRigs, while you fools keep
blowing each other up if you wish for this to remain the case!

Since speculation is the flavor, here's mine, butcept and unlike the
Filosofers, mine has a very strongly supported theoretical and empirical
basis.

Number two above being true, it is quite logical to think that the human
catalyst may just be the one that is DESTINED to set off the next BB...
per the second law of thermodynamics, sports fans, as it applies to
asymmetric transitions on a universal scale. Even in the worst case
scenario, we are at the very least one of nature's more preferred
methods for satisfying the second law of thermodynamics on a universal
scale, and this is observationally proven, which just happens to be the
Weak Anthropic Argument in an entropic light, for all you dim-bulbs
spinning roulette wheels out there.





Einstein said that god don't throw dice, and he was right, so don't
****ing tell Einstein not to tell nature what to do, cause he's the one
that proven to have the first clue about what nature will and will not
do!

Cyrus Jones proved that infinity equals a hundred and three...
-Dave Matthews
http://display.lyrics.astraweb.com:2...l..gravedigger