brodix wrote:

island wrote in message ...
brodix wrote:

Equilibrium is a parameter, not a goal.

Fraid not, although Boltzmann might at least sympathize with your
approach. Einstein's was better.

And Einstein thought gravity would collapse the universe to a point,
so he had to add the cosmological constant.

As gravity collapses mass it radiates the constituent energy.

Matter collapses, energy expands.

Since we accept gravity as contracting space, why isn't radiation
expanding space?


It is, at least, on the high-energy end of things, anyway, but certainly
not the way that you think. Had you read the post that's attatched to
the first link that worked, then you would have discovered the answer
without having to ask the question.

The first link broke up, but the second one repeated itself, and it
pretty much outlines the whole story...

....stay-tuned for the details...