Hey, Self-appointed Guardian-of-Groups'-Territories:

You are wrong on all three counts -
[1] This is no troll post
[2] It does not belong solely in the SR group
[3] It does belong in the physics group

Who are you to judge me?

My post pertains to general physics because it leads to
proof that (i) physics' time measurements are incorrect,
and (ii) no one has yet presented any proved-to-be-correct
method for measuring time.

For example, no physicist has ever proved that he can
correctly measure even a relative speed (e.g., the speed
of a car relative to a road).

Why is this? It is because no physicist has ever proved
that his clocks are correctly related temporally, and no
physicist has ever proved that his clocks are not physically
slowed, and no physicist has ever proved that his ruler is
not physically contracted. Only after these three things
have been done can any physicist properly claim to be able
to make correct time and distance measurements.

"Relative time" is a euphemism for "incorrect time."
"Relative simultaneity" is a euphemism for "absolutely
asynchronous clocks."