Dear Sergey,

I got tired from our discussion, but I did not lift my main objections
from my first post.

I like to elaborate on one point that I only hinted at at first and
then I only roughly sketched it. I had the impression, and you did
not comment on it, that you treat a surface integral as if it is a
line integral, with very bad consequences, and I mentioned dimensional
analysis.

According to you, for an experiment in which you have a wire just
inside a rectangular gap, either along the long or the short side: "my
emf has to depend on ratio between the long and short sides of gap. "
I concluded from that - in agreement from what I concluded from your
paper - that then the emf should be proportional to the length of the
wire inside the gap, as the forces of moving charges simply add up.

Then EMF = length * speed of change of flux or:
Volt = m * Wb/m^2 /s = Wb/s /m = V*s/s /m = V/m.
That can't be right, and would be detected when for example changing
the scale of designed electromotors.

As I wrote, according to standard theory, Volt = surface * speed of
change of flux.
Thus Volt = m^2 * Wb/m^2 /s = Wb/s = V*s/s = V

Best wishes for 2004!

Harald