kenseto wrote:

Analysis of the experimental design:
The MMX is designed to reveal the motion of the apparatus
in the stationary ether. However, it is clear that in order for the
experiment to show a none-null result the apparatus must be moving
horizontally wrt to the defined horizontally moving light rays. Since
the experiment gave null results it must mean that the apparatus was
not moving in the same horizontal plane as the defined horizontal
light rays. This means that the design of the MMX is flawed. Why?
Because even there is motion in the stationary ether the MMX is not
capable of detecting it.
What direction of absolute motion (motion wrt the defined horizontal light
rays)
of the apparatus will give a null result for all the horizontal orientations
of the arms? The answer to this question is: The vertical (up or down)
direction.
So is the Earth a source or sink of ether? Where does it come from/go to?


This defined direction of absolute motion (motion wrt the defined
horizontal light rays) will also explain why the speed of light is measured
to
be isotropic horizontally. The following link contains a proposed experiment
that will support this explanation for the MMX null result. Also this
proposed
experiment is the only properly designed experiment capable of detecting the
absolute motion of the earth's surface.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...apers/Seto.pdf


Ken Seto






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----