Y.Porat wrote:
(Bilge) wrote in message ...
Y.Porat:
(Gordon D. Pusch) wrote in message
...
"Jeremy" writes:
What about Quark-Gluon plasma? Does this not contain free quarks?
Depends on what you mean by ``free.'' They are ``free'' to wander
about through the volume of the quark-gluon plasma (``quagma'')
rather than spending most of their time in ``nucleon'' states
that only occassionally swap ``valance'' quarks; however,
they are _not_ free to leave the interior of the ``quagma.''
-- Gordon D. Pusch
perl -e '$_ = \n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'
-------------------
so may be you can tell us
where can we find experimentaly a 'quark gluon plasma'
in which you can see that there are quarks there
and in addition there are 'gluons' there??
Experiments are being constructed expressly for that purpose at
this very moment. See: http://alice.web.cern.ch/Alice/html/intro/,
for example or check to see what experiments are underway at
jefferson lab.
------------------
Perhaps a bit of philosophy or mythology is needed to understand why
these fellows, gluon-quark pairs, stick together so forcefully. Let's
assign operator status to one and information array status to the other.
It works this way, the operator exists between time frames to annihilate
a previous array or to create the next frame array, so that the array
location annihilated must be exactly where the annihilation operator
erased its existence, or, for the creation operator it can only create
the next frame array in the location where it exists. So by logic there
is no choice. The perceptual take on this is that the operator-array
pair are stuck together with an "infinite force", while in reality it
isn't infinite at all, it is merely "logical". Commanded by GOD perhaps.
This description also supports the concept that time for these
particle pairs is quantized.
So I suppose my take has some attraction to the Y.Porat conclusion.
[Snip]
they are wasting their precious time and huge money!
even if they fing quarks or any invited 'gluon'
it has nothing to do with our everyday nucleids.
by artificial invited experiments, you can get nearly
anything you invite.
imho ,the only *convincing experiment* can be done
if you get it directly from the nucleid (Proton or neutron)
sort of (methaphorically) if you squash a lemon-
you get out of it -lemon grains- just as 'primitive' as that.
(even with a low probability)
------------
all the best
Y.Porat
-----------------
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul M. Koloc; Prometheus II, Ltd.; 9903 Cottrell Terrace,
| Silver Spring, MD 20903-1927; FAX (301) 434-6737: Tel (301) 445-1075
| Grid Power -Raising $$Support$$ http://www.neoteric-research.org/
|
http://www.prometheus2.net/ mailto
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------