"Randy Poe" wrote in message
...


Could you post a few worked out examples of GTR
fitting the data for ionization potentials,
electro-negativity, antenna gain, a spring/mass/damper system,
a pendulum system, a gyro, or even a Moon shot?

Su Since GTR is indistinguishable from classical
solutions for all of these up to our ability to measure,
then applying classical Newtonian mechanics is
equivalent to applying GTR.

As I wrote:
"Could you post a few WORKED OUT EXAMPLES of GTR
fitting the data for ionization potentials,
electro-negativity, antenna gain, a spring/mass/damper system,
a pendulum system, a gyro, or even a Moon shot?"

In other words, is GTR a viable and cost-effective
approach to solving real world problems,
or is it a Tower of Babel that wastes
minds, money and time?

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
(As is money and time.)

--
Tom Potter http://tompotter.us