Perfectly Innocent wrote:

My exchange with David Thomas ):

Where there is no empirical data, there is no physics.

Does that mean that relativists should stop hyping all the popular
nonsense about SR that has no direct experimental confirmation?
Statements like, "there is no absolute time order," "there is no
absolute frame of reference," "no object can move faster than light"
and "everything is relative."

No, because there is tons of empirical data in that case.

OK. You believe that the absence of an absolute time order has been
verified empirically. Where's the empirical data? Please cite the
experiment(s) and the scientific publication(s). This should be easy.
Who is the physicist that built the first, non-existence detector and
that successfully detected the non-existence of something empirically?

Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org


Pardon me, but that sounds like Hocus-pocus. Please post
sample calculations using both theories for time dilation
for say a GPS satellite with observed velocity of 3.9 km/s.

Don't tell me we've go another crank that can't do a simple
calculation to show the validity of his crank theory!