View Single Post
  #6  
Old November 16th 05 posted to sci.physics.research
Chris H. Fleming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default Hydrogen in Relativistic QM

Igor Khavkine wrote:
Chris H. Fleming wrote:
In nonrelativistic classical mechanics and electrostatics the two
body bound state is an eliptical orbit.

In relativistic classical mechanics and electrodynamics the electron
will radiate as it accelerates and spiral into the nucleus.

In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics the two body bound state is
fine.


In either relativistic or non-relativistic classical mechanics, the
orbiting electron will radiate only when its interaction with the
electromagnetic field is included. Once that is don, in both the
relativistic and non-relativistic contexts, the electron orbit is
unstable as it will lose energy through radiation.


I know but nonrelativistic electrodynamics is inconsistent so I didn't
consider it.

My question is this: how do I know that the electron will not spiral
into the nucleus in relativistic quantum mechanics?


Here's a very heuristic explanation. In classical mechanics, when
looked at as a central force problem, the reason the electron orbit is
stable is the contention between the attractive Coulomb force and the
repulsive centrifugal force (as felt in the frame of the electron). If
the electron is allowed to radiate, then the centrifugal force will
become smaller and smaller until the Coulomb attraction makes the
electron crash into the nucleus. In quantum mechanics, relativistic or
not, due to the Heisenbert uncertainty relation, if the electron gets
confined to a smaller and smaller region (say the orbit radius steadily
decreases), then it's momentum and hence energy will become larger and
larger. Hence, there will be an effective force pushing the electron
outward preventing it from being confined to a progressively smaller
region. Hence, equilibrium can be established even if the electron is
allowed to radiate. Once equilibrium is reached (pretty much by
definition), the electron will no longer radiate. And this is exactly
what we see in the ground state of the Hydrogen atom.


So there is a pressure associated with HU? I have never heard of such a
thing. I know of regular pressure due to momentum, and other pressures
due to things like PEP.

How can I derive this? Do you have any references?

In the only QFT book I have that deals with bound states thoroughly,
the relativistic Dirac equation is used, but then a static field
used. Everything else is just a perturbation off of that. That would
be like doing relativistic classical mechanics but without the
electrodynamics. But there is no problem there to be expected.


There is no loss of generality in writing the electromagnetic potential
as A(x) - A_0(x) + a(x), where A_0(x) is a classical background and
the correction a(x) is allowed to fluctuate classically or quantum
mechanically.


Yes, but there is a loss of generality when a(x) is taken to be a small
perturbation with higher order terms thrown away. Especially if I am
trying to look for a large difference.

This is no more than field redefinition. In principle it
is not necessary, but it does make things easier in practice if A_0(x)
is chosen such that the expectation value a(x) vanishes in the ground
state. The reason that no problem with stability is expected is the
same as in my last paragraph. And the fluctuating a(x) field is
important. It's dynamics allow one to calculate energy shifts in the
states of the Hydrogen atom, e.g. the Lamb shift.

Is Hydrogen stable in relativistic quantum mechanics when you do not
approximate the field as static? I am extra confused because
positronium is not stable. The spiral occurs there. What is special
about Hydrogen that stops the spiral?


As pointed out in other replies. The instability of positronium is not
related to radiative losses, but rather to the possibility of
annihilation between the two particles.


I know it's not the same thing, but the classical spiral of death seems
somewhat analagous to positronum decay into photons. It's just that in
the classical case, there can be no particle production and infinite
radiation comes out for point particles. I could imagine fixing the
situation with extended particles and looking for some kind of
collision.

Ads
 

Mortgages - Debt Consolidation - Adverse Credit Remortgage - Loans - Mortgages