"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
ps.com...
|
| Spaceman wrote:
| "Eric Gisse" wrote in message
| ups.com...
| |
| | Spaceman wrote:
| | "OG" wrote in message
| | ...
| | |
| | | "Spaceman" wrote in message
| | | ...
| | | (repaired version thanks to OG)
| | | Lets suppose we have a flat surface that is
| | | as far as we know infinite in length and width.
| | |
| | | We mark a line and call it the 0 point.
| | | we then mark lines that are 1 mile away from
| | | this 0 point so we will have parallel lines every 1 mile.
| | |
| | | An observer stays at the 0 point (A)
| | | a second observer is in a spaceship (B)
| | | traveling at at .5c and the clock that is
| | | at the 0 point(A) starts when it (B) passes the 0 point.
| | | According to basic math and the clock at observer (A)
| | | position, the object will pass by the 93,000th line in 1 second.
| | | and the 186,000th line in 2 seconds
| | | etc...
| | | (silly basic math)
| | |
| | | so...
| | |
| | | ( I think it is all stated correctly this time..)
| | | How many lines would (B) pass if using time dilation
| | | as a physical fact for (B) according to SR.
| | |
| | |
| | | in 1 second - it would pass 93000 lines - however the observer in
(B)
| | | wouldn't agree that the lines are 1 mile apart.
| |
| | (they are physically 1 mile apart)
| | Please explain why observer (B) would not say such?
| |
| | Special relativity, space****. You think you know special relativity
| | then this comes as a surprise?
|
| Eric,
| apparently you think you are so smart,
| yet you have no clue, you are actually backing up
| one of the biggest scientific walls in the history of science.
| It is pretty funny to me, yet it is very sad for you..
| LOL
|
| In 5 years you will be in the same place you are now. That is funny to
| me.

Is that an SR prediction?
LOL
Too bad you are the one that will still be stuck in the
spacetime box with no way out..
LOL