View Single Post
  #4  
Old December 22nd 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.skeptic,sci.philosophy.tech
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 539
Default Einsteinians Test Einstein about E=mc2

The Origin of Unscientific Equation, E=Mc^2.

It starts from the special theory of relativity for mass,
m=m'(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2. If you expand this to be a poly-nominal series,
it gives, m=m'[1+1/2(v/c)^2 + 3/8(v/c)^4 +. . . . .].

Since v/c is negligibly small as in usual case, you can eliminate after
third term. Thus the simplified equation becomes, (m-m')c^2
=1/2m'v^2=E, and E=mc^2.

Do you think that this false equation can explain the Atomic Nuclear
Energy? Nonsense, absolutely! E=mc^2 is simply unscientific.

If you cannot neglect v/c, you should know another way of proving the
unscientific nature of E=mc^2.
Dr. Hansik Yoon disproved both deBroglei equation, λ=h/p, and one of
the key equations in the particle physics, E=hν.

From these two unscientific equations, another false equation, E=mc^2

is directly derived:

When deBroglei equation is applied to a photon(QM theorists defined
that photon has zero mass, so they defined arbitrarily, E=pc, pc=hν),
it becomes 1/ν=h/mc, where λ=1/ν, p=mc. Then the unscientific
equation, E=mc^2, is derived, combining with E=hν.

The real problem with E=Mc^2 is that this equation does not suggest any
information concerning the nuclear activities producing the nuclear
energy in the atomic nuclear structures.

This equation is nothing but the half of the kinetic energy of mass
moving at the speed of light.


Based on "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model" by Hansik Yoon
( http://www.yoonsatom.net and http://yoonsphysics.blogspot.com/ )

Ads
 

Credit Cards - Gas Suppliers - Debt Help - Credit Cards UK - Cheap Loan