Thread
:
If science education had done its job right
View Single Post
#
2
October 23rd 03 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
jmfbahciv@aol.com
external usenet poster
Posts: 7,899
If science education had done its job right
In article ,
(Patrick Reany) wrote:
If science education had done its job right,
You wouldn't be in a JRST .-1 loop.
.. you'd all be able to
correctly define the following terms: (physical) theory, (physical)
law, (physical) hypothesis, (physical) model, scientific method. So,
those of you that are so smug that you KNOW what the hell science is
really all about can define these terms for us here and now.
I can not remember one time in any class I've taken in science and
even in physics (I took the entire undergraduate core of physics
classes at a major university) in which any of these terms were
defined clearly, if they were defined at all! If your experience was
different, let us know what are those definitions you read. Please
give the references too.
I wouldn't define those terms in any of my books. Delete the words
(physical).
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
jmfbahciv@aol.com
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by jmfbahciv@aol.com
Find all threads started by jmfbahciv@aol.com
Ads
Guitar Lessons
-
Xbox Mod Chip
-
Myspace Stuff
-
Free Cingular Ringtones
-
Loans