View Single Post
  #58  
Old October 23rd 03 posted to sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics
George Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 225
Default Empirically Confirmed Superluminal Velocities?

"Robert J. Kolker" wrote:

Octafish wrote:


Wrong. However, possibly the majority of everthing in the universe
*is* moving away from us at superluminal velocities.


Wrong. You are making the Galilean error of assuming that velocities add.


You are making the special relativistic error (i.e., the universe is not
modeled by special relativity) that there is a unique definition of
velocity. Some (reasonable) definitions of cosmological velocity give
superluminal speeds. This doesn't violate the spirit of relativity since
these superluminal speeds cannot be used for information transfer.

Another possible stance is that there is no reasonable general
definition of distance and speed in general relativity, and therefore
this whole discussion is meaningless.

Regards,
George
Ads
 

Cell Phones - Bankruptcy - Libros recomendados - File Host - Car Credit