EL wrote:

Richard wrote in message ...

W = (v+w)/(1 + vw/c^2)


Need I continue?


Richard Perry

[EL]
From the paper, the group velocity is

{
vg = c/ng
}

From the same paper also, the group refractive index was measured to
be
{
Using a least square fitting procedure, we obtain a pulse
advancement shift of 63
(±1) nsec. Compared with the 0.2 nsec propagation time for light to
traverse the 6-cm
length of the atomic cell in vacuum, the 63nsec advancement gives an
effective group
index of ng = 315(±5).
}

They simply divided 63 ns by 0.2 ns and a dimensionless ratio is 315.

Therefore the group velocity is

vg = (3 x 10^8) / (315) = 952,381 meters/second

Can any one see any superluminal **** in this velocity?

Nevertheless, the suckers comment saying

{
We note here that the measured superluminal pulse propagation inside
the transparent
anomalous dispersion medium is a linear effect.
}

Naturally if they have divided 0.2 by 63 and stated that the new group
refractive index was 0.0031746[031746]° rather than
1.0031746[031746]°, then any decent scientist could have sued them for
fraud but what they did is pretend to misinterpret the result which is
a very normal delay in an extremely dispersive medium.

What that paper was doing is taking the reader in a wild tour
demonstrating a rigorous experimental setup to convince the reader
that it is serious science if that reader was competent and to get the
reader lost and baffled if the reader was incompetent. Then suddenly
they fabricate the outcome and while admitting that the so elaborately
prepared signal was delayed by 63 or 62 nano-seconds in the dispersive
caesium medium while in vacuum it is delayed by 0.2 ns only, you find
them claiming that it was 315 times faster rather than slower!

If they dare to say that that 62 ns is the time interval between
reading an output first and then pumping an input then how many asylum
residents would believe that claim?

Any forward shift must be an artefact of the 50 KHz continuous pulsing
where the output of a previous dispersive pulse is grouped with a
current vacuum reference pulse.

The scam is clearly based on the rabid desire from the physics
community to confirm time variance as proposed by Einstein
relativities.

This is really sick and I CAN debunk every single fraudulent claim
made by assholes who seek fame riding on an ancient error for
rewarding the biggest asshole a Nobel Prize.

EL

I bow before your greatness EL You really are bark 'and' bite. Now if
I could only get you to work on my direct particle interaction (DPI)
theory, maybe work out the propagational details, or just the
statistical aspects

Richard Perry

http://www.cswnet.com/~rper