October 19th 03
posted to sci.physics,sci.logic,sci.math,alt.math.undergrad
|
|
|
Core error argument objection refuted, short
"James Harris" wrote in message
m...
"David Moran" wrote in message
...
"James Harris" wrote in message
m...
"David Moran" wrote in message
...
"James Harris" wrote in message
m...
(Nora Baron) wrote in message
deleted
Also incorrect and false. Remember what you said above:
"... consider w_1(m), a factor of a_1 that is a factor of f..."
If w_1(m) is a "factor of f", that can only mean f/w_1(m) is
an algebraic integer, which of course implies that uf/w_1(m)
is an algebraic integer: this is your *assumption* here.
The assumption is itself a contradiction, in that it requires the
ability to define one algebraic integer function by the
multiplicative
inverse of another algebraic integer function.
Basic algebra.
IF THIS IS BASIC ALGEBRA, WHY CAN'T I UNDERSTAND YOUR ARGUMENT? I
UNDERSTAND
ALGEBRA PERFECTLY AND NONE OF THIS MAKES SENSE TO ME.
Unfortunately the people who *do* understand it are doing their best
to confuse everyone else, and you've done your part by basically
heckling me with posts.
If I didn't have mathematicians fighting me, then I could carefully go
through each and every detail to work it out so that everyone who has
a basic grasp of algebra can understand.
But first I need you to help me, by NOT letting posters like "Nora
Baron" and Arturo Magidin get away with muddying the waters.
Other posters need to begin challenging these people who have betrayed
you, after all, they've had many of you nodding along with something
as dumb as xy=2 with *both* x and y algebraic integers where x varies
over the algebraic integers which you get using u=1, f=2, and the
assumption of a w_1(m) as a factor of f that's a varying factor of
a_1, with x=w_1(m), y=uf/w_1(m).
It's posters like Arturo Magidin and "Nora Baron" who've helped make
mathematicians look like fools and patsies, willing to lie and
challenge mathematics itself either willingly, or from incompetence.
James Harris
It's you who are subjecting yourself to the heckling. If you want the
heckling to stop, either stop posting, or stop the personal attacks. I
can
think of a much better way to do what you're doing, but will you listen
to
me? Probably not.
David Moran
Readers here's what I was replying to from this *same* poster, which
I'm copying down from this post.
IF THIS IS BASIC ALGEBRA, WHY CAN'T I UNDERSTAND YOUR ARGUMENT? I
UNDERSTAND
ALGEBRA PERFECTLY AND NONE OF THIS MAKES SENSE TO ME.
So I reply thinking that maybe the guy is serious, and you can see
what he said in return, and notice his arrogance and lack of social
graces.
It's like I'm dealing with children with VERY bad manners.
James Harris
Hey, I'm not arrogant to anyone who doesn't deserve it. You need to grow up,
James. Your name calling makes me think I'm reading something from my 7 year
old brother. I can be nice, or I can be mean; you decide.
David Moran
|