David Kastrup wrote:
"Schoenfeld" writes:

Nth Complexity wrote:
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
By the way, zero is usually taken to be both positive and
negative.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha!
And you expect to teach OTHERS?!

I'm not certain Dirk is wrong. Most websites (like Wolframs) imply that
0 is neither positive or negative, but I don't think it's possible to
prove this (at least I can't, perhaps someone else can comment).

You don't prove definitions.

Please READ what I said properly. I referred to the definitions (i
re-posted my post correcting symbol misplacements). Address queries in
other thread branch.

--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum