The one who will give the proper answer will be greatest scientist ever
lived. And yet, the answer must exist.

Henry Haapalainen


"Zeb Glittering" kirjoitti viestissä
...
In article ,

says...

If you can't give three examples, then you aren't matching your
hypothesis to reality. This is what science does. It's called
experiment that is reproducible.


Right at the beginning, I indicated that I was giving a philosophical
answer
to a philosophical question. At the end, I said why I thought it may be of
use. I admitted that I wasn't saying very much, but that's very different
from
saying nothing at all.

Of course I haven't matched my hypnothesis to reality. Wasn't it clear
that I
was communicating a hunch for which I feel a strong conviction? It doesn't
necessary follow that I have the skills of education to go about testing
that
hypothesis. It doesn't necessarily mean that the idea is worthless.