In article ,
(Zeb Glittering) wrote:
In article , says...

400 lines of crap arrive at the amazing conclusion, "reality is."


You missed the point.

No, he didn't.

..The point was to suggest how an 'abstract' truth can
create reality, rather than just being considered as something separate and
mysterious, or as only a concept in a mathematician's head.

If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride. You need
to learn how to make something from scratch. Six months
laboring on a farm (not watching, but doing the work)
would teach you most of what you need to know.




That point is impossible to grasp if you don't make a sincere attempt to
understand it. Instead of dismissing my feeble attempts to explain as crap,
you could make an effort to try to understand what I was getting at.

It's up to you. I'm not a crackpot, and I'm not on drugs, and I haven't got a
hidden agenda. Neither am I an idiot.

I wonder why I bother, though. Maybe people just aren't prepared to entertain
anything that's more than 1% away from what they 'think' they know already.


Define the universe; give three examples.


By 'Universe', I meant everything - things, concepts of things, concepts of
impossible things, kernels of truth, everything. By 'universe', I meant one
of the supposed parallel universes. I can't give you three examples, but good
luck looking for them.

If you can't give three examples, then you aren't matching your
hypothesis to reality. This is what science does. It's called
experiment that is reproducible.

/BAH