Well having read the Critique of Pure Reason I can honestly say that I
don't really 'get' Kant's philosophy - I'm more Wittgenstein oriented
myself. But, to return to the argument at hand ...

The problem I have with George's post doesn't lie with the content, but
with what George thinks that content proves. As a piece of creative
writing, for instance, it reads interestingly enough. But prophecy or
science!? I would say it's neither of those, although clearly George
wishes it were both!