"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
mountain man wrote:

http://www.mountainman.com.au/aether_8.htm

Empirical idiot.


"Just because the results happen to be in agreement
with observation does not prove that one's
theory is correct" (Dirac 1987, p. 196).



Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether to 1.7x10^(-15) relative

The above results are for two specific types of devices:
vacuum based and solid-state based interferometers. What
are the results for gas mode interferometers, and why do
they differ from the vacuum and solid state configurations?

Absence of evidence is not equivalent to
evidence of absence. (logic is supposed to
be one of the cornerstones of physics).




http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation


Contemplate Lorentz's
Aether Theory.





--
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
OZ
www.mountainman.com.au/aetherqr.htm