George Hammond wrote:

[...]

(see: http://www.mtsu.edu/~dsmitche/rim458...als/Video.html )


How does this link support your "PPF" hypothesis?

Also, this is the reason why "home movies" were all shot at
16-18 frames/sec, and not 24 frames/sec... to keep the cost
of film/developing down.


Here's something to learn, George:

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/recording/motionpicture1.html

Schornak
claims that he can "see 40 frames/sec" as still pictures. Obviously
this is crazy since billions of people are sitting in movie theatres
world wide watching 24 fps movies and can't see a single frame
of it as an individual picture.. silent films prove that they can't even
see single pictures at 16 frames/sec!


Oh, George, it's not only me. You admitted yourself you can see
the 40 single frames - everyone can see them. You mismatch this
with a motion picture where different frames show different ob-
jects. A continuous loop of two images isn't a movie!

If you deny the result of an experiment you performed yourself,
then you leave the path of science and enter the field of theo-
logy, where knowledge is replaced by beliefs. Making this step,
you're no longer a scientist - you're the high priest of SPoG.


Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak

--
http://schornak.de/aspog/index.htm

Official Bulletin for George E. [Hammond] fans!