George E. Hammond wrote:

Of course it takes more bits to recognize Times Roman from a Gothic
type face, or to tell the color of the print, than it does to tell an
A from a B or a C.
Fact is, it is a proven working fact of everyday research that
recognizing a single letter from the alphabet requires 2^4.7 = 5 bits,
and DECADES or published research data have used and confirmed
that fact... all of which YOU are unaware of.
You're stupid... an IQ test is not changed because your sensory
system is telling you you have to take a ****, or that there is a
scent of roses in the air, or your ass itches. Higher level cognitive
functions operate independently of such myriads of sensory input..
such as what typeface the IQ test is written in, or what color ink...
or the fact that the test appears to be printed on 30# bond
watermarked paper.
Did you ever stop to figure out asshole, why the FUSION fRAME
RATE of a movie film is equal to the maximum bits/sec of the
observer.... what an asshole... the fact
that thousands of bits of information are contained in the film
has NO EFFECT on the PFF..... for the same reason the thousands
of visual bits on an IQ test has nothing to do with the speed with
which you can identify which one of the 26 letters appears in the
parenthesis (Z)... namely Z. Fact is, it takes 5 bits of information
processing.... and decades of research by thousands of
researchers have CONFIRMED as a practical fact, that that
decision time can be easily isolated, and measured.... despite
the fact that 1,000 bits of sensory itching information is coming in
telling you that the broad you slept with last weekend probably gave
you the crabs. Fact is, the Picture Fusion Frequency, is one of
the world's most DRAMATIC PROOFS of that fact... even though
the film may be of a P-51 Mustang firing 1,000 rounds per
minute at 300 mph flying over thousands of trees... the fact is
that the PFF is only 15 frames/sec for the average person,
can be easily measured, and is a reliable predictor of the
person's IQ !
That happens to be an experimental fact confirmed by 100 years
of testing.


Hey, George - I love your phantasy! If we have a look at what you posted
in http://schornak.de/aspog/peer-4pg/0100b.htm and have a look at your
_only_ source of information http://www.v-weiss.de/lehrl-full.html, it
is astonishing how many theories you developed out of that tiny piece of
text.

BTW - you still ignore that I have falsified your theory experimentally.
Please read http://schornak.de/aspog/peer-4pg/0100.htm once again, PFF
is discussed there on a basic level. Even _you_ should be able to follow
the thoughts and get the insight that "PFF" is something invented by the
incredible [Hammond].

What about the peer-review of my Anti-SPoG? There's 800 MB free webspace
waiting for your rebuttal...


Greetings from Augsburg

Bernhard Schornak