View Single Post
  #10  
Old August 18th 05 posted to sci.physics
David
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy


Y.Porat wrote:
David wrote:
Y.Porat wrote:
why dont you give credit ti people?
it was me who was putting the question:

'i want to know why bound state is less energy than
unbound'
so why dont you note that this is Porats question??
have you hear ed about decency/?

now i gave you there an answer as well
but you didnt got it

Y.Porat
-------------------------------





You are funny Porat... even a question needs to be
credited?? Well. I am perplexed by nuclear binding
energy and that's why I asked it. I only now got
interested in nuclear physics.

----------
there is one thing that a (probably Young) goat
still dont know:

a good question is half the way to a good solution
so even a good question could Be copyrighted
got it?
----------

Hmm.. you are either crazy or a super genius Porat.
Here's some idea to make you busy.


i can assure you that i am neither of the above possibilities
i may have some personal properties may be a very
unique personal history that by rare coincidence of its components
enabled me to do what i did.
------------

Try to invent something where you can make every
matter become fissionable by modifying the nucleus thru
your snake nucleus model.


1 it is not a snake model
it is 'chain of orbitals' unprecedented suggestion
so just remember it
one day it will pay off
it is indeed revolutionary
now you should know that wile i started my nuclear research
i followed all the conventional way
and realized after a long agonizing time that it leads to no advance
you will also do all that way wast your time
and come as well to no where
but there is only one difference
for me there was no one to worn me that i am wasting my time

for you there was one !!!.....
--------------

Does your model have this
possibility?


not at all
it shower you dont understand the basic of physics

it is possible to dismantle any nucleus
yet the to be or not to be question is
is it a gaining energy process or a loosing process
now the trend of all matter in our world is
to loose energy with time
to get to the 'bound state'
if you like the entropy rule
and once you realize that our universe is say
15 billions years
you can imagine that most of its matter went a long way
on that loosing energy road
so no magic can extract miraculously energy
while there is no potential energy in it
IE getting more of it than investing in it!!
----------
For example one can use a pencil, stone,
wood and put it inside a Porat Fission Chamber to
convert it to a fissionable substance (Porat Patent).
Then hit it with neutron gun to initiate thermonuclear
detonation. I'm sure you will become the greatest scientist
in the entire planet.


-----------
i appreciate wild thinking
btw it is one of my secrets to let imagination go on
but later
the sever critic side of your personality has to come in
and 'cool you down' by merciless criticism
it seems that you didnt do the second job
that i mentioned above so
please do not call me* crazy while do seem to do it much better!! (:-)
--------------

Standard model may not allow this to happen. But since
you mess up the nucleus so much by turning it upside
down.

wrong
i didnt turn it upside down i only corrected some paradigm.
for instance that for any proton there is an electron---
in the heavy Atoms !!



You are as silly as Lockyer who can't even understand the
mathematical and physical basis of HUP. The electron can't
be confined inside a proton or even nucleus. It seems you
have some mental block for that knowledge to be absorbed
in your head. Hmm... maybe instead of inventing things.
How about things. Do you have contact with any personnel
in Israel that has accessed to the nuclear assets?? Can you
smuggled to nearly Gaza a good amount of fissionable
material where it can be rerouted to another country?
We'd pay you for it. Don't worry. We want to arm ourselves.
I am a muslim living in country oppressed by the United
States. We don't have any defenses. Our people are being
victimized without let up. We are desperate and only nukes
can give us the hope. Can you help us build one too?

David Sayaf



it took me a long agonizing way to get to it
while wasting a lot of time just by that paradigm
and mind you one of the reasons that QM never went far beyond
decoding the iron Atom is that false paradigm!1
--------

Maybe you can figure out a way to make
ordinary matter fissionable?


a dead by arrival idea!
------------
Try to invent some Porat
Ray where you can shine it on any matter to transmute
it to fissionable.. then we can use a satellite to say beam
it at a building at Iron.. then send neutron projectiles
on the building to turn lose every proton and neutron
and release all the binding energy enough (or as needed)
to vaporize Iran or North Korea in one blast. How about
that?

----------
and you talk about crazy??

-------------

Porat. Try to spend your remaining years on the above
task. Do more experiments at home and stay away from
the internet. You are way more advanced than anyone
and only you can understand yourself. Goodluck.

----------------
do you imagine that i will stop my activity
and
LEAVE IT TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU ?? (:-)
keep well
and keep your advices for yourself first!!

ATB
and best wishes especially for your mental condition.

Y.Porat
-----------------


Ads
 

Debt Consolidation - Buy Anything On eBay - Credit Counseling - Loans - Buy Anything On eBay