Y.Porat wrote:
why dont you give credit ti people?
it was me who was puting the question:

'i whant to know why bound satte is less ebergy than
unbound'
so why dont you note that this is Porats question??
have you heared about decency/?

now i gave you there an ansewr as well
but you didnt got it

Y.Porat
-------------------------------




You are funny Porat... even a question needs to be
credited?? Well. I am perplexed by nuclear binding
energy and that's why I asked it. I only now got
interested in nuclear physics.

Hmm.. you are either crazy or a super genius Porat.
Here's some idea to make you busy.

Try to invent something where you can make every
matter become fissionable by modifying the nucleus thru
your snake nucleus model. Does your model have this
possibility? For example one can use a pencil, stone,
wood and put it inside a Porat Fission Chamber to
convert it to a fissionable substance (Porat Patent).
Then hit it with neutron gun to initiate thermonuclear
detonation. I'm sure you will become the greatest scientist
in the entire planet.

Standard model may not allow this to happen. But since
you mess up the nucleus so much by turning it upside
down. Maybe you can figure out a way to make
ordinary matter fissionable? Try to invent some Porat
Ray where you can shine it on any matter to transmute
it to fissionable.. then we can use a satellite to say beam
it at a building at iran.. then send neutron projectiles
on the building to turn lose every proton and neutron
and release all the binding energy enough (or as needed)
to vaporize Iran or North Korea in one blast. How about
that?

Porat. Try to spend your remaining years on the above
task. Do more experiments at home and stay away from
the internet. You are way more advanced than anyone
and only you can understand yourself. Goodluck.

David