Thread
:
Electromagnetic theory without Relativity
View Single Post
#
1
August 14th 05 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
Posts: 7,679
Electromagnetic theory without Relativity
wrote:
Special terminology in this article:
{} indicates superscript (including the power).
[] indicates subscript.
~A means the vector A.
^a means the unit vector a.
four means 4.
(A)[av] means the average of A.
In a capital Greek letter the word "cap." is written.
We show integral around a closed space as circulation.
We show round d (as used in partial derivation) as round.
13 Electromagnetic theory from a new viewpoint
Ed 01.12.31 -------------------------------------------
Abstract
--------
We consider point magnetic charges as the sources of the magnetostatic
fields, like the point electric charges for the electrostatic fields.
Why? Milliken demonstrated the quantization of charge
in some old oil drop expeiment, but there is no evidence
for "magnetostatic charge", on the contrary it's a misnomer
since magnetic effects are *observed* to occur in relativistic
circumstances.
As a concept (as you write about) it might be a good
theoretical tool, but your article doesn't look simpler than
the classical stuff, Maxwell +SR.
Do you predict anything new, or simplify how things work?
Ken S. Tucker
....
Ken S. Tucker
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Ken S. Tucker
Find all threads started by Ken S. Tucker
Ads
Loans
-
Apply for Credit Card
-
Unblock Myspace
-
Guitar Lessons
-
Plumbing Directory