George,

Why do we need you to "scientifically prove" that God exists? We can all
just simply read his posts right here in the news group. Your claim of a
"Theory of God" seems completely redundant to me.

James


"George E. Hammond" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 06:57:18 -0400, JohnM wrote:

Come on george, it's getting boring in here. Tell us more about your
funny little god.. **** him off some more, it's great when you do that...

John

[Hammond]
It sure is boring.

No one has demonstrated enough intelligence about the SPOG to
even get my attention.

Usenet is for losers, I'm busy writing a book.

Will be posting FYI (read only) messages when I feel like it.
I don't waste time anymore replying to pseudo-intellectual
Usenet freaks.



========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================