View Single Post
  #1  
Old October 7th 03 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default Superconductivity/Electronegativity Experiment true theory ofSuperconductivity; differentiating Classical Physics from QuantumPhysics

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snip everything else)



So, reading this news item in SCIENCE NEWS of 11May02 of a inverse
proximity effect of lead with silver films. Superconductivity
temperature increased from 1.6 K to that of 1.8 K.


That experimental datum suggests several things.
(i) all materials at a cold enough temperature are superconductive and if
so, then superconductivity is a Classical physics phenomenon
(ii) the difference between pure lead superconductive at 1.6 K and that of
lead mixed with silver films is a huge difference even though the rise in
Tc is a small difference suggesting again that all materials are
superconductive and thus Classical physics involved
(iii) Superconductivity must be a geometrical phenomenon such as
diffraction gratings in that lead at 1.6 K and then another geometrical
addition of silver film to enhance the geometry, again suggestive of
Classical physics

Classical physics is Conduction Band theory and no-one has really explored
the Maximization of Conduction Bands such that normal-conductivity becomes
superconductivity.

Classical physics is Electronegativity/Electropositivity and no-one has
really explored the Maximization of Electronegativity where we take say
fluorine and cesium, cool them, and where the cesium wants to push a
electron and the fluorine wants to pull a electron and between the push and
pull is a electric current self-initiated and self-built. Superconductivity
is not a spontaneous current creation but when maximization of
electronegativity and electropositivity is created then superconduction is
a cinch.

So if we combine Conduction Band Maximization with
Electronegativity/Electropositivity then Superconduction is a cinch.

It seems to me, at this time, that Superconductivity as evidenced by lead
and silver film can all be explained by Classical Physics of Conduction
Band and Electronegativity and that the state of superconduction is a
maximization of Conduction Band and/or/or both Electronegativity.

Troubles with Quantum strangeness as explanation of Superconductivity:
My favorite here is to think that photon messengers combine to become some
neutrino hybrid as a messenger and we all know that neutrinos travel
through matter with almost zero resistance. Trouble with that idea is that
if lead is superconductive at 1.6 K by quantum strangeness in converting
photons into hybrid neutrinos then why should the additional sprinkling of
silver film enhance this conversion. When we study polarization we do not
get better polarization by the tiny adjustment, or do we.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Ads
 

Remortgaging - Internet Advertising - Shooglenifty - Debt Consolidation - Guitar Books