Stephen Harris wrote:

There is no _purpose_ involved in what you call fine-tuning or evolution.

Okay, I tried to keep my fingers quiet, but this has just gotten to be
too much!

A "new" Anthropic principle goes as follows, and please note that the
primary entropic inclination of every object in a big bang induced
expanding universe says that you cannot make an unfounded faith-like
philosophical leap outside of this primary inclination of natu



1. The constants of the universe are finely tuned to require intelligent
life by the Principle of Least Action as a means for maximizing entropic
efficiency within the constraints of inherent asymmetries.

2. The weak argument simply states that the landscape is equally
important to this, and must be conducive to increasing entropy, e.g.,
the energy that we can expend in the direction of survival must be
readily expendable, so the cooperative environment enables entropy to
increase, and this means that the entropically preferred system can
raise the energy level enough to breach whatever relevant environmental
constraints in order that entropy may continue to increase.

3. In other words, the evolutionary process indicates that entropy
continues to increase to higher orders of entropic efficiency, (as it is
observably proven if humans "leaped" to evolve from apes to the fire
breathing monsters that they are today), and this is how asymmetries are
carried perpetually forth by the second law in the impossible effort
toward idealistically pure symmetry.

Nature express a primary inclination, and there's plenty of purpose
behind that. Technology is a huge player, so get off the random
roulette wheel of chance and adopt a real concept. How many systems in
nature can produce anti-particles?... puts us right up there with black
holes and super-novae in terms of entropic efficency on the high energy
end of things, and the fact that the human-system is possibly the ONLY
system that "attempts" to mix all levels of energy in nature is a strong
indication that we are linked to the universal like no other system in
nature is, but even the worst case scenario places us high on the list,
having a truly universal connection.

Like the man said... "god" doesn't throw dice', and they should have
listened the first time.

I've already show this group the physics of the entropic evolutionary
process by which the universe and humans commonly evolve, and yet they
continue as if nothing at all got said, even though I openly challenged
the group to "agree" that this is important... whatever... Whatever is
right!... Whatever happened to the good ole' days when John Baez, Matt,
Oz, Charles and others would be all over this for the neat and plausible
thing that it represents? I don't understand what's happend to this
place?