From Osher Doctorow

So we come to the question of what it means for the universe code to be
noncommutative in regard to M1M2M3L1L2L3T1T2T3F1(F2).

The most interesting thing is that a clue is available from metrics and
of all things additively-subtractively! From ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 +
dz^2 - dt^2 or its negative, we get an additive noncommutativity
distinguishing time from space. So already whether the triple
("codon") L1L2L3 is to the left or to the right of T1T2T3 arguably
makes a difference.

So we already have two "strings" of characters in the universe code:

1) L1L2L3T1T2T3M1M2M3F1(F2)
2) T1T2T2L1L2L3M1M2M3F1(F2)

The first string is correctly described as the representation of our
"time is causal" non-black-hole universe. The second string arguably
describes the reversal of time and space in black holes. Triples to
the left of other triples are "causes" of the right triples.

I suppose that Sir Roger Penrose's twistor theory might roughly be
described by:

3) M1M2M3T1T2T3L1L2L3F1(F2)

since his twistors are used to attempt to create "space-time" geometry
(time, distance, etc.), while a more usual approach with spacetime
either on an equal footing or causing matter and so on would have the L
and T parts to the left of the M and maybe F parts or else would be
commutative which wouldn't discriminate the orders.

Notice that an infinite number of dimensions is neither out of the
question nor indicative of nonlocality. In fact, even a Mickey
Mouse-like balloon which expands differently in different directions
gives us an idea of the general nature of expansion-contraction which
involves an enormous number and arguably an infinite (even uncountably
infinite!) number of directions/dimensions of L type but "tied to" each
local point or little string. This does not yet mean that those are
all dimensions in the same sense as L1, L2, L3 since arguably dimension
and direction aren't the same.

Osher Doctorow