To Martin

Old Man I know but who the **** are you.

I would really love to stay and explain how Newton turned Flamsteed's
erroneous axial rotational /stellar circumpolar equivalency into a
geocentric heliocentric/orbital equivalency but from your posting
history you are a mere theorist disciples and it is'nt worth my time.To
break this down into a simple statement even you can understand -
Newton changed the relationship between the way axial and orbital
motion is gauged against each other so that he could make his readers
believe that they can do astronomical modelling of planetary motion
directly from observational cataloguing

Here,eat Newton's garbage for what he says (using Kepler) is a
bright shining lie -

PHÆNOMENON IV.
"That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
distances from the sun.

This proportion, first observed by Kepler, is now received by all
astronomers; for the periodic times are the same, and the dimensions of
the orbits are the same, whether the sun revolves about the earth, or
the earth about the sun."

http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/phaenomena.htm

There is your Newtonian quasi-geocentricity right there,the beginning
of framehopping that ended with the ultimate homocentric concept of the
early 20th century.

Enlighten !, as a Christian who has seen the horror of
Copernican/Keplerian insights directed towards the opposite ends to
which they originally served -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernican_principle , I assure you that
in our short existence before the magnificense of the universe,Old Man
is looking out on something that he has spent a lifetime denying and
dodging.He will be thanked for dying without remorse in order to keep
the conceptual corpse dancing when he should be fighting tooth and nail
to stop geocentricity (sunrise) from lapsing into subhuman
homocentricity.


..