"Timo Nieminen" wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.50.0501130933070.18650-100000@localhost...

Well, the speed c-v that he objected to my use of was exactly the
speed at
which the light pulse closes with the moving mirror.

But what would you expect? Do you really think Androcles would have
admitted being wrong?

No, I will not, because I'm not wrong.
(c-v) is not equal to 1/sqrt(epsilon0 * mu0), which are constants
and the basis of Mazer's argument that Maxwell's laws apply.
Therefore c-v is not permitted in SR, which says c = (c-v)/(1-v/c)

SR does NOT explain MMX, and source dependency does.
Source dependency also explains cepheids as quite ordinary stars,
recurrent novae as ordinary stars, flare stars as ordinary stars
and changes the orbital parameters of eclipsing variables, which
if the source independency model is used would rip apart from
tidal forces in a mere century.
NOBODY has ever measured the speed of light from a moving
source in the vacuum of space. That is about to change.
Androcles.