"Androcles" wrote in message
k...

[snip]

You can assume I'm not a fool. That's about all you can assume abut
me.

There is no evidence to support that assertion. There is, on the
contrary, vast quantities of evidence tosupport the opposite. Reread
all the garbage Androclown has spouted about simple non-relativistic
position-time calculations.

[snip]

Both Maxwell's laws and the Galilei-invariant analogue of
Maxwell's
laws predict that the velocity of a light wave is independent of
the
velocity of the source.

You have yet to show what you mean by "Galilei-invariant analogue "

I gave Androclown a references for that calculation about four times
now. You have failed to follow it up.
Here it is again:

Turner "Relativity Physics"Section 2.4 Page 26.

It is an introductory undergrad text and the algebra involved ia quite
simple, but in all probability not simple enough for Androclown to
follow, judging by past performance.

[snip]

Franz