"Androcles" wrote in message k...

"Randy Poe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
Androcles, you seem to have the attributions totally screwed
up. Since Randy's post do not appear here (is this a private
mail discussion, or what?), it is almost impossible to find
out who said what.

He's carrying on a discussion from a couple of other
threads. He claimed that I was insane for referring
to an equation which I never posted, I gave him the
reference to the posting containing that equation,
and he abandoned that thread and started this one.

The content he quoted at the start of this thread
was my post, in toto.

We are currently engaged in what you would think would
be the elementary calculation of how long it takes
a light signal travelling at c to catch up with
an object travelling at v, but somehow Androcles
manages to get enraged about the definitions of
everything, including the distances between objects.
None of it is in private e-mail.

- Randy

Poe snips any questions I have and imagines he can teach
that way. He knows nothing about frames and is making a
complete fool of himself.
Androcles.

If Randy thinks he can educate you, he must be a complete fool
indeed, but somehow I think (and hope!) that Randy is trying to
accomplish something else.

Dirk Vdm