"Randy Poe" wrote in message oups.com...

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
Androcles, you seem to have the attributions totally screwed
up. Since Randy's post do not appear here (is this a private
mail discussion, or what?), it is almost impossible to find
out who said what.

He's carrying on a discussion from a couple of other
threads. He claimed that I was insane for referring
to an equation which I never posted, I gave him the
reference to the posting containing that equation,
and he abandoned that thread and started this one.

The content he quoted at the start of this thread
was my post, in toto.

We are currently engaged in what you would think would
be the elementary calculation of how long it takes
a light signal travelling at c to catch up with
an object travelling at v, but somehow Androcles
manages to get enraged about the definitions of
everything, including the distances between objects.

Actually, Randy, you guys are currently engaged in the
elementary calculation of how long it takes for you to
(rightfully) call him a piece of dog****, so he can say
*plonk* and pretend to never read your posts again.
He thinks you are suffering and he's having the time of
his life. If you might happen to think he is suffering,
you could be right or wrong. One never knows what a
piece of dog**** might be thinking.

Dirk Vdm