Does God need to prove He exists?
On Jul 7, 8:31 pm, rbwinn wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:59�pm, Free Lunch wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:53:52 -0700 (PDT), "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)"
wrote in alt.atheism:
On Jul 7, 9:25 am, Free Lunch wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:46:07 +0100, "Steve O"
wrote in alt.atheism:
"rbwinn" wrote in message
...
I don't have to be familiar with Satan to know that a plot to betray
Jesus Christ came from him, not God.
Robert B. Winn
So are you saying that the crucifixion was the work of Satan, and that
Christ should never have been sacrificed?
Kind of creates a little problem with your theology, don't you think?
Remember that the theology of Christianity tells us that God is a
sociopath.
I always thought she was a frustrated paranoid scitzo megolomaniac
with a serious inferiority complex and tendencies towards manic-
depression.
Okay, but that leads to sociopathic behavior. Lucky for religionists,
God doesn't exist, since the stories about God tell us that God was
responsible for more deaths than Stalin, Hitler and Mao combined.
The hypothetic god thing isn't human, so there's no
reason it should see humans as "people", so the sociopath diagnosis is
no more valid than for a tiger that kills someone.
More like a person who collects kittens to drown them.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well, all you are doing is saying that God is guilty of murder every
time a natural death occurs. I do not think you will get far with
that idea.
Robert B. Winn
Why not when you always say that god is every way all the time?
|