On Jul 2, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:13 am, GSS wrote:
On Jun 29, 3:44 pm, John Kennaugh
wrote: GSS wrote:
.......
Yes, qualitatively it is an old idea. But I have developed the old
qualitative idea into the quantitative regime of physics. The novelty
of the subject book is its analytical study of the stress strain
patterns in the physical space continuum. I wonder if you have been
able to follow the derivation of equilibrium equations in chapter 15
of the subject book!
The criticism I would make is that if the universe is expanding then
vast amounts of the "physical space continuum" is being created from
nothing. Something physically real from nothing.
No, the universe is not expanding. There is some interpretation flaw.
In our earnest quest to understand 'Nature', it is not rare to make
faulty interpretations of experimental observations.
http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index...tter=B&spage=3
........
Its already been shown that the universe is expanding at an
accelerating rate.
Show me where I am wrong.
Mitch Raemsch
Before I could show you where you are wrong, kindly show me the basis
on which *you* believe that the universe is expanding at an
accelerating rate. Specifically,
(a) What are the experimental observations which (you believe) can
only be interpreted as 'expanding universe' and nothing else?
(b) Which existing law, theory or model of physics supports the
hypotheses of expanding universe?
(c) By 'expanding universe' do you imply that the 'spacetime
continuum' of GR expands as a whole or do you believe that only
physical space expands with the expanding universe?
(d) Do you believe that with the expanding physical space, its
permittivity and permeability constants eps_0 and mu_0 also decrease
or increase in the expanding universe?
(e) Do you believe that with the expanding universe additional new
physical space (or spacetime continuum) is continuously being created
out of nothing or that only the existing physical space (or spacetime
continuum) is expanding to a 'bigger' volume?
GSS