On Jul 1, 2:28�pm, John C. Polasek wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:
On Jul 1, 9:21�am, " wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:22?pm, John C. Polasek wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:52:41 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:
http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
Tom, this is my result, copy/pasted:
Your search -http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf-
did not match any documents.
an't imagine what is
Suggestions:
? ? * Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
? ? * Try different keywords.
? ? * Try more general keywords.
John Polasek
John, I click on your paste and the link shows up.
�I can't imagine what is wrong with your access.
�Has no one else had your problem?
Regards; Tom.
http://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Ph...ometric-Struct...
John, try this:
Go to:
http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/
Then go down the list and double click on CHARGESPIN.pdf
BTW. while you are there, you might like to download �:
Quantumstepresistancedissipation.pdf
I wrote this paper a couple of years ago and never got around to
publishing it, rathe I included the information in my book available
from Amazon.com
Yes, that's a wonderful list of your papers. We haven't seen your hand
in a couple of years. I tried to absorb the ideas. In chargespin it
looks like Poynting is chasing his tail, in fact it looks like the
curl of some quantity. Are you able to arrive at the magic number
1836?
John Polasek- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
John, yes the structures scale to the mass ratio of both the proton
and neutron.
The composites are constructed of their final decay particles,
(electrons and neutrinos) the neutron clearly shows the elecron and
electron type neutrino are in the neutron rather than being created
just at the time of decay.
The structures give the proton mass ratio of; 1836.14676824396 (NIST
1836.152701)
And the neutron mass ratio of, 1838.6843966164 (NIST 1838.683662)
Regards: Tom.
P.S. NIST adjusted the fundamental physical constants in 2007 so many
of the papers in my FTP files are out of date.
The new book just published (2008) shows the new constants. I had to
rub in the fact that the standard model cannot derive a single
fundamental constant, and the geometry I have been working with gets
them all to the same precision they are known experimentally.
http://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Ph.../dp/096315463X