On Jun 5, 5:28 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:20:16 -0700:



On Jun 3, 3:49 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
As i already pointed here several times, I am working in an *extension*
of both SR and GR. The theories of SR and GR are recovered in a well-
defined limit of a more general and sophisticated theory.

The theory reduces to GR and explains *why* the speed of gravity in GR
coincides with the speed of gravity. However this is not true in the
generalized theory.

The new theory is a sophisticated formulation based in mathematics and
physics developed in last few years. Technically it is a nongeometrical
DPI many-body theory in Liouville space with universal evolution
parameter.

As already said GR results are obtained as special case and the limits
of geometry and spacetime fixed :-)

Your accusation of using 1908 physics and maths looks thus completely
irrelevant and your re-accusations look very unfair :-)

Ok, who is your target market, (evidentally not me, as you Juan insist).

Simple, people who do not make unfair criticisms about works he never
read first :-)

Take a look at this article and provide a
criticism, (it's a couple of straightforward
pages),
http://physics.trak4.com/modern-spacetime.pdf

Also, people who take five minutes to read references provided instead
repeating mistakes were corrected in print :-)

Well Juan, I have looked, so far I find your
mathematics and physics ambiguous. Why don't
you write up a synopsis/essay as I have demo'd
above, as a link for the group.



I'm interested in the new predicticts your theory makes, apart from our
classicals. Ken

Oh, i am too :-)

The dual theory make several interesting predictions (for both
electrodynamics and gravity) and also solves well-known difficulties with
the former theory (when interactions travel at c).

That is, the new theory gives right answers for questions that former
theory gives us wrong.

If you had taken a look to references cited you would already know at
least this part :-)

Good, we are looking forward to a synopsis.
Regards
Ken