On May 29, 3:56 am, GSS wrote:
Friends,
I have been taking part in various sci.physics discussion forums on
usenet for almost a decade now. Even though I found these discussions
quite useful, still I failed to communicate my viewpoint to most of
the readers. Perhaps, communication of a certain viewpoint in bits and
pieces cannot be expected to 'stick', to have any permanent
impression. On the suggestion of a well wisher, I have now compiled
all the bits and pieces of my un-orthodox viewpoint into a new book
titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields". Keeping in view
the nature of contents, I want to get it reviewed by the competent
readership of the usenet forums, before getting this book formally
printed. I also want to get suitable feedback for improving the
presentation and readability of this book.

However, for getting a brief over-view or introduction before
downloading the book (or any of its chapters) kindly visit the
website,
http://www.geocities.com/gurcharn_sandhu/index.html

Therefore, I earnestly request all readers to kindly spare a little
time to review and suggest improvements for better presentation and
readability of the said book. Specifically, the following
shortcomings, if noticed in the book, may please be pointed out.
(a) Logical, mathematical or typographical errors if any.
(b) Inconsistencies in presentation of the viewpoint, if any.
(c) Faulty assumptions or faulty deductions, if any.

I found nothing regarding one of my primary areas of interest. In
the electron-beam version of Young's two-slit diffraction experiment,
we understand that the matter waves of the electron(s) interfere with
each other just as do the wave aspect of photons in the light beam
version of the experiment, which makes sense as mass is not quantized;
however, electric charge _is_ quantized and does not lend itself to
self-interference. Yet as we see, the charges of individual electrons
_do_ behave like waves and give us no "which way" information in one-
electron-at-a-time experiments.

How do you address this?


Mark L. Fergerson