On May 19, 6:06*am, wrote:
Thanks for your comments Autymn

I have updated the pub with the " abs: (22/2)^5 maps to the "W" particle mass
*at a -2.3% fit."

you see my problem......I don't say mass is whatever;
*a simple 5th power law's values say it *;
hence the QED marker's legitimacy as in a "formal-proof" syntax.

On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:07:01 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:

On Apr 29, 12:42*pm, wrote:





* * * * The simple equation "( n/2 )^5 . n= 1 to 11"
* * * * has 11 values that map in a simple mathematical fashion
* * * * to the entire range of Elementary Particle mass QED.

* * * * n * * * Name * *e mass *error% *Energy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
* * * * 11 * * *MAX * * 5033 * *1 * * * 2.6 Bev ; Observation set limit * * * * table maximum
* * * * 10 * * *Om * * *3124 * *4.6 * * 1.6 Bev as Tau and Omega range
* * * * 9 * * * Proton *1845.3 *-0.5 * *943 Mev *Proton
* * * * 8 * * * K' * * *1024 * *-0.4 * *523 Mev *---- K' as Half of Kaon and Eta sum.
* * * * 7' * * *Pion * * *275 * -0.7 * *(243+32 ) as 7'=6 plus UNIT /CMF
*upper half
----- * 6 * * * Empty mid zone at n=(6*2)/2
*lower half
* * * * 5' * * *Muon * *211 * * -2.1 * *(243-32 ) as 5'=6 minus UNIT/CMF
* * * * 4 * * * CMF * * 32 * * *7 * * * Common Mass Factor at ~16Mev to 18Mev ; a 3D UNIT.
* * * * 3 * * * ? * * * 7.6 * * ? * * * 3.88Mev ; an unknown zone; perhaps Dark matters?
* * * * 2 * * * e * * * 1 * * * 0 * * * NEGATIVE electron; reference mass; 0.511 Mev !
* * * * 1 * * * eN * * *1/32 * *0.1 * * Smallest Neutrino in Tritium Beta decay at 16 Kev; * a MIN

7 - 525 - 268 MeV
6 - 243 - 124 MeV
5 - 98 - 50 MeV
4 - 32 - 16.5 MeV

Be honest and say 5 and 7 fail; you got 5.8 and 6.15. *

[Pls re-read the lengthy text for the muon and pion fits.
-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5

Finally, consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value
at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.

It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of (eN) the anti-Neutrino measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%) *

This doesn't mean anything; there are a world of keV-leptonic decays,
and 16 keV isn't the rest mass of anything.

?/e: 2 eV
?/?: 190 keV
?/?: 18.2 MeV

--------------------------- *Hypothesis for the zone at ( 3/2 )^5
* * A new 3.88 Mev mass/energy zone is predicted; It might offer insight into Dark
matters!

It's weird how 8 sits exactly between K and ?. *But there's no order
for your other integers: - e d ?/? - ?? - K? p * ?/c. *10 at 1.6 GeV
fits too many mesòns and barýòns..

No, you are missing the point *particle mass is mapped by n/2 to the 5th curve!
what that means is nucleon scale IS NOT linear in any sense of our macro scale of cc or more
your assumptions lead you to overlook the Primal message ;
Mass, whatever it is etc, falls on the n/2 5power CURVE; exact integer values had already been seen.
Ever ask yourself "What is MASS and where is it?"

This theory asserts MASS exists in a tiny *volume,
a near-nuclear scaled region that has its own laws.

I have loosely titled the theory :

* * * "subSPACE ; The fifth dimensional domain of 3D volume
* * * *where the MASS of a Particle resides/exists".

No, the mass is where the field is, so it's not in a tiny room for
most of each mote; however, it's the tiny room thas makes most of each
mass.

OK I do not believe in Quarks or strings but here was the obvious fifth dimension
Come in out of the 'Field' and
1 * * * * * n/2 to the Fifth power law maps the entire range of Elementary Particle Masses!

Your scale somewhat works for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9. *4 may not pan out.
But you start with a tiny mass, and many powers, so you can always
claim they hit other motes with small error. *The vast greaterhood of
so-called hadròns are the same two or three quarks in isomeric orbits,
even thouh they bear different names. *Each of those hav near-infinite
excited states, which make the PDG's book even fatter. *So it's not
hard to hit any of them. *The ratio between two masses at exponend 5
is between 2 and 3; as many of these motes are composite of two with
some leftover potential--mesòns and neutrinos--you can fit u-d and c-b
on the scale, but this match breaks up after two generations as the
heavier hadròns must cram in manier bosons for stability. *And the
motes on your scale are random; there should not be one formula
between elèctròn and protòn, and the formula within a family would be
better gèometric than exponential.

The muòn's original family was mesòn wherefrom its weiht--as is the
piòn's later--but as it behaved lik the elèctròn they switchd their
mind for leptòn. *Also, motes in a family fain decadore within:
barýòns to barýòns, mesòns to mesòns, leptòns to leptòns. *Fundamental
motes are already midweiht however and are fermions; so thas the piòn
has integral "spin" (trend) should hintan it's composite of such
motes. *As the neutrino isn't midweiht but is a fermion led me to my
discovery of its compositude of fermion and boson:http://google.com/groups?q=supergenium.

muòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ kaòn+ elèctròn-

piòn- - muòn- kaòn- elèctròn+

kaòn- - piòn- piòn - 'u'd 'u'u, 'u'd 'd'd = s - d'u'u, d'd'd

= piòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ piòn+ piòn+piòn- elèctròn- piòn-
piòn+piòn- elèctròn+

If the muòn is a fat elèctròn, then the piòn is a lean kaòn. *But in
the above explication one can see the muòn is merely a common factor
in the piòn-elèctròn series, where the muòn hosts pionium-elèctronium
condensva. *No wonder why the piòn spills so shortly. *I wonder if
calcium-48 makes a good muonic pith. *As the piòn is a fundamental
hadròn, one should redefin a leptòn as such a mote at the bottom--then
the protòn, piòn, quark, elèctròn, plasmòn, iòn, wimpòn, warpòn, and
dilatòn are all leptòns. *Their energèts such as hýperòn, kaòn/D/B, s/
c/b/t, muòn/tauòn, radiòn, and whatever elles then are barýòns. *Weak
ashhy stabil atoms such as heliòn, nucleonium (degenerate), neutrino,
epsilòn (K elèctròn-nucleòn), and geogen (whatever makes geòns), and
other dark (clear) matter are lastly býssòns.

2 * * * * * Since "Elementary Particle mass values" *are predicted via *(n/2)^5
* * * * * * it can not be disputed, given this definitive 5D power law! QED!
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied

They're not elementary, so no.

3 * * * * * It's Physics and Mathematics in a one to one identity.
* * * * * * subSPACE is real and the observed domain of Particle Mass!
-------- 3rd assumption satisfied

mathematic artefact

Well, that's it; *comments are welcome
as well as any ideas about the 3.88 Mev zone ,
as it's the only unknown index in the 1 to 11 range.

If anything is found around 3.88 Mev or its multiples.
it would be an additional validation for ...

The Planck charge solitòn is a better goal.

-Aut
--
*Yours truly * *RD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Mass motion is undetectable until it changes.

Mitch Raemsch