"bz" escreveu na mensagem
98.139...
"El Enrrabadore-mor" wrote in
:


All I have is the above abstract which leads no where.
Read it where? Can't read the paper. I don't have a clue
on what Uncle Al said, as everybody else, since that's
exactly the point.

I will e-mail you a copy.
e-mail me at bz plus nanae at chem dot lsu dot edu

Many thanks, but I don't have nor time nor enough
interest to read it.

I was just looking for someone that could make any sense
explaining how relativity deals with the most common
problems of all - rotations.

Rotations might sound something irrelevant to most of
the readers, nevertheless no one, ever, had pointed me
a celestial body which is not rotating and orbiting.

Besides that, gyroscopes are still unexplained.
Gravity and inertia are still the major source of speculation.

Lost my faith on physics. It become a religion.
Once more, I've just take some time to show how
pathetic physicists are about rotations.
Physics rely on Euler's equations which fail on spheres,
the shape of all celestial bodies (proven in this thread).
Besides that, since nobody had said or pointed
anything relevant on what really matters to me, which
are "Gyroscopes and Waves Power Transfer", I'm going
back to my painful work deluded about physics and
it's inability to explain by equations the most basic
of all - "The Wheel Invention".

Regards.
(I won't even take time to reply Darwin123)