PD wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
I was not entirely comfortable withe PD's offer to work on
Ken's experiment. I think I see where PD was going, but of
course Ken would and should reject the offer. What purpose
was served?

Actually, after doing some basic background checking on Mr. Seto, I
wrote to withdraw my offer to him.

Glad to hear you withdrew the offer. The one thing I would want
to know from a background check is whether the money is coming
from a source that can afford to lose it; no details.

Mr. Seto did not take kindly to my
performing this check, which at some point produced some concern among
those are connected to him. My background check was more thorough than
this contact that he's aware of.

Mr. Seto is woefully underprepared on all measures for this
experiment.

That is painfully obvious from his posts and his website.

If his so-called PhDs are at all competent, they will
quickly discern this for themselves. It may be that they don't care --
one can imagine all sorts of reasons why.

For the record, if the background check had come out otherwise, then I
would have been happy to provide my services to the utmost of my
professional ability. I have no vested interest in protecting
relativity. This is true for any physicist here.

Sure. My problem with the offer was that it goes along with the
the delusion. Watter under the bridge now.


--
--Bryan