On May 12, 6:31*am, Albertito wrote:
On May 12, 2:48 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

On May 12, 3:56 am, Albertito wrote:
[snip without reading]

Once again, R and R' are also experimentally undistinguishable.

One can construct any number of theories that are "experimentally
indistinguishable" from SR in specific circumstances, which is not
interesting. Only theories that are distinguishable from SR are
interesting.

Don't be such a ****head. A theory that is experimentally
indistinguishable from SR means it is still alive, because
it can live within the error bars. There is a lot of theories
that are distinguishable from SR, but most of them are dead,
because they have been falsified by experiments.

The model I've presented to you is experimentally indistinguishable
from SR, but it is theoretically distinguishable. If you don't find
this model interesting that's because you are a ****ing moron.

Again, true but uninteresting.