On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:01:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On May 12, 3:36 pm, www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:42:20 -0700 (PDT), Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum

wrote:
Earth will be fine. You are what needs to be fixed. Our ET friends knew

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?

Um, er, no. Is Ron Paul still running?

And where can I get my car fitted with a hydrogen fuel cell?
You'd think someone would start a big biz doing that.
People would be lined up for hundreds of miles to get one.

Our resident hydrogen wizard William Mook will filler-up, and dirt
cheap none the less. All you have to do is somehow manage to live for
another couple decades before his first commercial tonne of hydrogen
becomes available. Of course by than fossil and/or synfuel fuel might
be going for $25/gallon.

Nah, oil is nearly depleted. And HHO has been known to be a fuel for, what,
maybe 80 years?

If we all had the “USA inflation adjusted” income to go along with our
“USA inflation adjusted price of gasoline”, as such there wouldn’t
hardly be any problem, whereas I too could manage to get by on that
USA inflation adjusted income of $10,000/month after federal tax, in
personal loot (same as $156.25/mo as of 64 years ago).

Um, free energy will make everything cheap. You won't need an increase in
salary. And the internet will provide the free communication. Those com
companies won't last much longer on a fiat currency.

How much were you earning (take home pay) as of 64 years ago?

http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-003.pdf
“i n 1946 and resided in nonfarm areas was about $2,100 as compared
with $1,000 for women”

Divide that average income roughly in half for the typical nonwhite or
farm worker (this only applies to the nonfamily employed worker
because, the bulk of whatever the local/farm family member received
was paid via room and board).

Since I would have been much higher paid than average, by at least
twice that average of $175/month, makes my 1946 earnings worth $350/
month. Now multiply that by 64 = $22,400/month.

As I’d said, there’s no great problem with spending $5/gallon, as long
as I had the after tax take-home loot of $22,400/month to spend.

Of course that still doesn't fix a damn thing for most other places on
Earth, that are simply getting summarily screwed left and right, as
well as top to bottom, by the fossil fuel sucking and global inflation
likes of yourself. And here many sit and wonder, as to why Muslims
and a few too many other nice and low carbon footprint kind of folks
are a little ****ed.

Pay me 64 times that much in take-home pay as of 64 years ago, and
we’re perfectly good to go at $5/gallon.

I wonder if our fellow spook/mole rusemasters of newsgroups even know
the meaning of _duh_?
. – Brad Guth