On 11 mayo, 18:58, kenseto wrote:
On May 11, 9:57 am, " wrote:



On 11 mayo, 09:49, kenseto wrote:

On May 9, 10:35 am, " wrote:

You know ****o, it is you who is showing and proving day after day the
kind of retarded person you are.
You don't know what isotropy means, even if the meaning of the word is
provided to you. Then you are so moronic as to say that "the observer
doesn't move wrt different light fronts from the same distance in
different directions" is implied by the isotropy of light.
Do you understand the phrase "isotropy of light"? Do you see anywhere
in that phrase the word observer?

Hey idiot it is you who don't understand what isotropy of light means.
You said: What's transit time over an equal distance got to do with
isotorpy of light?

I rest my case.

FDucking idiot...if the observer move wrt the light fronts then the
light fronts will take different transit times to arrive at his
location and that means that the light did not arrive at him
isotropically. You are so stupid.

You once more show your total ineptitude on this subject. You ignore
completely the meaning of light, light fronts, isotropy of light,
location of observers and relativity. You also know close to nothing
of mathematics, physics and of course English, which for sure is not
your native language. Why are you writing here is a mistery, but also
it is quite clear that everybody thinks you are a joke.

So keep us entertained.

Miguel Rios