On May 10, 10:39Â*am, PD wrote:
kenseto wrote:
On May 8, 8:08�pm, PD wrote:
On May 8, 9:32�am, kenseto wrote:

On May 7, 4:20�pm, PD wrote:

On May 7, 2:44�pm, kenseto wrote:

On May 7, 10:17�am, PD wrote:

On May 7, 8:16�am, kenseto wrote:

ROTFLOL...this runt of the SRians failed to come up with a valid
argument so he back paddled.

So, Ken, let's recap your position for a moment.

Lets capture your position: Apparently you are so desperate that you
tried to swindle $22,000 from me!!!!!

I don't need your money, Ken, so desperation has nothing to do with
it.

Sure it has everything to do with it. You tried to swindle money from
me

How did I try to swindle you, Ken? I gave you a fee estimate for my
services. How is that a swindle. If you take your car to the shop, and
they tell you what it's going to cost to fix it, and the number is
more than you thought it was going to be, is that a swindle?

and at the same time gains the opportunity to sabotage my
experiment.

I'd gain nothing by sabotaging your experiments. If you thought they
were sabotaged, you could always repeat them with someone else's help.

The point is: It would be too late...you already got my money.

It's not your money, remember? It's the money of a private supporter.

So what? That doesn't mean that I can speend their money without
making sure that it is being spent wisely.

Your supporter gives you money on the condition that you spend it
wisely on the skillful execution of your experiments -- and for that
you need an expert.

Right...and I have lined up two PhDs for that at no cost.

Ken Seto