"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
| On Sat, 10 May 2008 00:30:38 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
| .. .
|
| | vt is the distance the startpoint (wrt static frame)
| | of each element of light moves backwards (in the rotating frame).
|
| The "distance" vt along an arc, not a straight line.
|
| It's so small it is as good as straight.
You'll never be a mathematician as long as you have a hole in your arse.
|
| |
| | What you should have said is
| |
| | "For one ray, ct = 2piR+vt , for the other ct = 2piR-vt. This gives t
=
| | (2piR +vt)/(c+v) and (2piR-vt)/(c-v)"
| |
| | I'd like to know how.....
|
| Ok, I'll tell you. Whether you understand or not is up to you.
|
| 2pi is an angle. It is 360 degrees of angle.
| 2piR is a distance around the circumference of a circle (all of it).
| pi is an angle. It is 180 degrees of angle.
| piR is a distance around the circumference (half of it).
| pi/2 is an angle. It is 90 degrees of angle.
| piR/2 is a distance around the circumference (quarter of it).
|
| alpha is a small angle.
| alphaR is a small distance around the circumference of a circle (part of
| it).
|
| Mathematicians can add angles.
| When we add 2pi to alpha we get a slightly bigger angle than 2pi
| If we multiply that by R we get a slightly greater distance than 2piR
|
| We write
| (2pi + alpha)R = 2piR + alphaR
|
| Ref:
|
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Distributive.html
|
|
| |
| | although it would have been
| | neater not to mix angle with linear distance.
| |
| | t = R.(2pi+alpha)/(c+v) and R.(2pi-alpha)/(c-v) where R.alpha = vt.
| |
| | Still, schoolboy mathematics is beyond your capabilities (and
| Tusseladd's).
| |
| | ....your maths ability is aptly demonstrated above......
|
| It always has been. It is nothing more difficult than
|
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Distributive.html
|
| That is of course "Raving again...."
|
| Lesson 2:
| t = R.(2pi+alpha)/(c+v) and R.(2pi-alpha)/(c-v) where R.alpha = vt.
|
|
| Perhaps I should call it " *My* theory" but that would rather silly,
| you would be expected to know before starting a
| rookie course in mathematics.
|
| Examine this:
|
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...gnacIdiocy.htm
|
| Einstein wrote
| the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
| the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
| the "time" each way is the same.
|
| That is ****ing ridiculous.
| It IS...and so are you.
Interruptions moved to he
| If ct = 2piR+vt as you state, then t certainly does not equal (2piR
+vt)/(c+v),
| as you claim.
|
| This is 10yo stuff.
Beyond your mental age of 5 then.