Elvis, I think you're being unfair.
....
The right analysis is that time dilatation is a consequence
of the speed of light and the DISTANCE travelled by light.
That is, time dilatation only is required for observations made
at distance, by means of light, like Einstein said.
Not the actual bull**** that follows because physicists only
have a stone hammer to work with.

Our discussion has evolved to the transition
from SR to GR, in the weak field limit, that
was fairly much agreed upon in the early 20th
century, that have empirical support.
Most of the fella's have given more than an
adequate airing of your misunderstandings, in
fact I'm surprised you haven't been flamed to
a crisp, so why throw insults?
Ken
BTW, before lecturing us, learn to ****ing
spell "dilation", that's the 2nd ****ing
time I've told you that!