More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On May 9, 8:52*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 8, 9:34*pm, Tim Little wrote:
[snip]
Both of these guys are very malicious idiots. Any science you bring to
the table that doesn't support their position will be rejected.
For example - note kooby's claim about year long exposures, and read
the definition of the rem.
************************************************** *******
That's a recurrent feature in these cranky posts: one begins shouting
nonsenses that make it clear he's very dumb (Shoenfeld).
Then enters the game "the scientific one", who is as cranky as the
first one but plays the "wise guy" (bradguth). This time the nonsenses
acquire an antisemitic (or antinegro, or antimexican or antisomething)
tone, with lots of minion/brown-nose(??) stuff.
Some time latter a new crank appears (Koobee) and begins a two-voices
counterpoint with one of the first two cranks, and sometimes even with
both.
It is very expected each time....and this occurs once every 4-5
months, aprox.
It could even be that all 3-4 cranks are one and the same...
Enjoy it, if you can.
Regards
Tonio
|