On May 8, 1:23 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
On May 7, 4:14 pm, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:

The purpose of your reply eludes me.
Try asking him the question that none of the moon
landing conspiracy crackpots can answer;

what exactly
do you claim really happened and who was in on it?

You are avoiding the issue.

No, that is the issue. If you cannot say what you
believe was actually done you have no case.



All I got was a few grunts in reply.

You have erroneously interpreted them as grunts.

They were not answers to my question. Neither is your
reply - it is pure bluff and bluster.

That is because of
your strong BELIEF IN what you have been taught in the first place and
also very strong peer pressures.

I am waiting for you to set me straight. What really
happened in your opinion.

Martin Hogbin

Apparently you consider the regular laws of physics and the best
available worth of independently peer replicated science as "pure
bluff and bluster". Now that's every bit as interesting as all get
out.

What happened is that the USSR and those of our DARPA/NASA tried every
good, bad and ugly trick in the book at keeping as many of their own
kind fully employed and fully benefited for all they could muster. In
other words, the rest of us village idiots got snookered and
subsequently dumbfounded past the point of no return.

The USSR only sort of lost our mutually perpetrated cold-war game,
though only because we had managed to first run them out of business
(so to speak) by having cut off as much of the global market as
possible, as well as having forced the USSR to run through most every
last bit of their national energy and food resources by way of having
diverted the best of Russian talents in the process, as well as this
mutual cloak and dagger process having taken much of our best
resources and public loot to boot, of which then needed to be financed
by the 3200% of energy inflation that we see today.
.. - Brad Guth